More Anti-Christian Bigotry from Homosexuals

Every argument used against President Bush's nominee for Surgeon General, Dr. James Holsinger, for his Bible-based view of homosexuality (as seen here) can be used against the homosexuals who are against him. It may take a little thinking, but they really do.

Now, is it controversial to say that homosexuality is not "complementary" physically? Sorry for the graphics, but do the sexual "parts" complement each other in homosexual sex, or heterosexual? That's a no brainer, and it's no wonder that this will therefore lead to more injury and disease. Tell me again what's controversial about this?

The president of the Tauro University Gay Straight Alliance, Mr. Hopping said Dr. Holsinger's views offended him. Is it just me, or does living in a society where speech is free mean there will always be a risk of offending and being offended. When someone says "I'm offended" it does not mean the offender is automatically wrong! Sometimes truth and offense go together.

So, it seems to me that people need to grow some thick skin. Welcome to adulthood where people get offended and where you offend people. In fact, I'm offended by what many homosexuals say about Christians.

And, concerning Mr. Hopping saying Dr. Holsinger has to be neutral. Why? And I'm sorry, Mr. Hopping, but if doctors are good / qualified if they're neutral, I have to ask if you're neutral? I don't think so since you are the PRESIDENT of the Tauro University Gay Straight Alliance.

This paragraph is telling:

"Holsinger's role on the national Judicial Council of the Methodist Church also is proving to be a source of concern for gay rights groups. He cast a dissenting vote in 2004 in a decision on whether to retain a pastor who was lesbian. The majority agreed to maintain her position. Last year, he also favored a pastor who wanted to block a gay man from joining his congregation. "He has a pretty clear bias against gays and lesbians," said Christina Gilgor, director of the Kentucky Fairness Alliance, a gay rights group."

If this is not religious discrimination by homosexual activists I don't know what is. Her words demonstrate a pretty clear bias against Christians, especially those who disagree with her.

Finally, to demonstrate the bias of the article they end with these words of Mr. Hopping: "It's a leadership issue. It's showing that he's not even aware of the problems that we have in the United States with healthcare."

What Dr. Holsinger's views have to do with his leadership and awareness of healthcare problems in the U.S. is beyond me. In fact, I'd say it's a pretty good bet that DR. Holsinger, Kentucky's top public health official and chancellor of the University of Kentucky's medical center, knows more about healthcare in the U.S. than MR. Hopping the third-year med student. Just a guess.

Many may say what I wrote above was not loving. First, remember that it is very difficult read tone into printed material so giving the author the benefit of the doubt is a must when reading her. Second, the most loving thing a person in the right can do to another who is misled is to lovingly explain the truth and expose falsehood. Third, I've spoken / witnessed to a number of gay men, and each one has told me how refreshing it was to hear the Christian worldview from me.

I don't say that out of pride, but to say that hatred or disgust of homosexuals was not driving anything I wrote above, but actually I was driven by a desire to expose the fallacious reasoning made by the homosexuals in the article, and to defend someone who is probably going to be "tarred and feathered" in the media (I heard a pejorative news report of this good man made by a radio news reporter today).